Forums Site Forums Suggestions
  • Topic: pics on home page

    Back To Topics
    (0 rates)
    • February 18, 2011 8:36 PM GMT
      • Post(s)
        251
      • Thank(s)
        0
      • Thanked
        0
      • cR(s)
        0 0

      Untitled

      Its getting better and better for sure!!!
    • February 18, 2011 9:20 PM GMT
      • Post(s)
        41
      • Thank(s)
        0
      • Thanked
        0
      • cR(s)
        0 0

      Untitled

      And everyone should be happy that I finally sorted out the "naughty" group so that only group members get info'ed of the posts, pictures, etc.

      I've tested it by posting (you have to jion to read it, teehee) and it seems to be working. Let me know if there are any problems.

      Hugs
      Jasmine
    • February 18, 2011 10:56 PM GMT
      • Post(s)
        251
      • Thank(s)
        0
      • Thanked
        0
      • cR(s)
        0 0

      Untitled

      Makes sense you norrrthy norrrrty girl :)
    • February 18, 2011 11:43 PM GMT
    • Untitled

      I agree with 90% but think it is going too far to say you have to have a face shot .. if I want to be one of Henry VIII's wives why shouldnt I be. I t is one thing stopping things that might cause offence in the public domain but quite another telling others what pics they have to have. Thats my pennies worth anyhow. :)
    • February 19, 2011 12:39 AM GMT
      • Post(s)
        4
      • Thank(s)
        0
      • Thanked
        0
      • cR(s)
        0 0

      Untitled

      It would be neither fair nor realistic to insist on any member having to have a face shot, main picture or otherwise. There must be many admireres who wish to keep there true identity a secret. I think the issue is between what can and cannot be described as potentially offensive. Dick and arse shots are out, along with anything that could be generally considered crude, vulgar, or overty suggestive. A dick, vaguely hidden behind a pair of the wifes flimsy panties is still a dick shot ! A scantilly clad figure, not displaying an obvious 'bulge', may well be 'respectable', albiet seductive, and why not ? after all, it is an 'adult' site. Let's just make it, and keep it, a 'clean' site - if anyone is looking for salacious or tasteless content, there's plenty of that on Chix !
    • February 19, 2011 7:32 AM GMT
      • Post(s)
        251
      • Thank(s)
        0
      • Thanked
        0
      • cR(s)
        0 0

      Untitled

      Exactly Frank!!! On thematter of Headless Huntsmen, which the deleted member raised, as I have no desire to be hunted by anyone let alone headless ones, as long as the headless do not wish to contact me they can be here as much as they want- Anyone that wishes to contact me will need to have a head :)
    • February 19, 2011 8:25 AM GMT
      • Post(s)
        866
      • Thank(s)
        2
      • Thanked
        10
      • cR(s)
        0 0

      Untitled

      I was the one who raised the issue of Henry VIIIs headless wives, not the "deleted member" - pse read my post where I explicitly state that I have NO issue with privacy. However, no 1/2 way intelligent person who wishes to retain privacy and chat with anyone here can expect to chat very much, if they bhave no face pic. As to meeting them......how......I wouldnt know what they look like (smile). I agree totally with April-Mae on Headless Huntsmen...for me its simple - no face pic, no contact.
      As to "adult" pix I think the suggestions put in place now by Becca cover most people's concerns about adult shots on profiles. But I do think we need to be careful that the "puritan police" dont turn this new site into something bland. Its easy to go to Birch Place or TVchix for raunchy shots, though lots of people there are TWs (Time Wasters)...the downside of all adult sites. This is a new site, so we have the opportunity to be in the middle where we can appeal to a broader audience than TINT, without (hopefully) the downsides of the raunchier sites. hugs P xxx
    • February 19, 2011 9:08 PM GMT
    • Untitled

      Henry VIII only had 2 headless wives, who were probably the most beautiful, and youngest. What has that got to do with this forum? Nothing. Except, like those 2 after their executions, one couldn't have any sort of meaningful relationship with them.
      I agree it is difficut to get into some sort of dialogue without a picture to relate to. I would prefer to have at least one photograph with each member. Someone joining the this site is presumably attempting some social interraction, and not just a private 'ogle'!
      I think Beckie's guideline re no bum/tit/pricks as main profile pics is a correct one. There is an opportunity to put raunchy shots if that is your thing, in the gurl naughtiness bit of the site, which could be made members only. Jasmine's comment on the feelings of being a bit "naughty" is a real one, and most T-girls seem to enjoy the tarty look.
      I also take Pauline's comment of no face pic, no contact, We 'Girls' don't have to contact anyone, so that can become self policing. Also if you want to respectable and clean, then buy Hello, or some other publication; full of gossip and pictures, and keep away from sites like this.
      Also adult albums can be marked as such and restrictions on access can be placed.
      Hope the comments have added positively to the debate, and I think that Nicky Miniskirt would enjoy the first comment,
      Love Robbi xxx
    • February 19, 2011 11:57 PM GMT
      • Post(s)
        24
      • Thank(s)
        0
      • Thanked
        0
      • cR(s)
        0 0

      Untitled

      was it divorced , beheaded, died
      divorced, beheaded, survived ?
    • February 21, 2011 12:20 AM GMT
      • Post(s)
        15
      • Thank(s)
        0
      • Thanked
        0
      • cR(s)
        0 0

      Untitled

      yes
    • February 21, 2011 6:35 PM GMT
      • Post(s)
        24
      • Thank(s)
        0
      • Thanked
        0
      • cR(s)
        0 0

      Untitled

      how can' girl naughtiness' or whatever you decide to dress it up consist of male genitalia- there's nothing girly about a dick. Just makes us look sad
    • February 21, 2011 6:44 PM GMT
      • Post(s)
        41
      • Thank(s)
        0
      • Thanked
        0
      • cR(s)
        0 0

      Untitled

      lol Terri, I had to check what I had previously posted, photo-wise before I commented.

      I guess it is up to the individual taste, as a crossdresser, I find the feminity in men and myself arousing (TMI?). For some it is about getting the rocks off, and like in my forum, I commented that that is where I thought I was going until I spent more time on Transtastic, and I am realizing, for myself, that it is not all about the "porn star." It is still a sexual activity (dressing) for me but I think it may become a bit less X-rated than when I was younger. Age maybe there is wisdom?

      Kisses
      Jasmine

      PS--I will still gladly contribute and lead all the naughtiness!
    • February 21, 2011 6:45 PM GMT
      • Post(s)
        41
      • Thank(s)
        0
      • Thanked
        0
      • cR(s)
        0 0

      Untitled

      Above is in regards to my intro post...
    • February 27, 2011 6:17 PM GMT
      • Post(s)
        13
      • Thank(s)
        0
      • Thanked
        0
      • cR(s)
        0 0

      Untitled

      i was invited to this discussion therefore i shall add my opinion!

      Im no expert with regards what can or cant be done in terms of moderation although seeing explicit photos should be basically an opt-in choice. How this is done i dont know as moderation by a small group of people over thousands of photos is nigh on impossible. I suppose relying on users to declare x rated photos is a start and then perhaps the flagging facility will 'clean up' the naughty people haha.

      Each to their own BUT personally id rather choose whether or not i want to see some flaccid c0ck surrounded by stockings and suspenders belt struggling to contain hairy legs and belly haha.

      Decorum please, whatever part of the huge gender/sexual rainbow you identify with!

      Michelle x
    • February 27, 2011 8:13 PM GMT
      • Post(s)
        251
      • Thank(s)
        0
      • Thanked
        0
      • cR(s)
        0 0

      Untitled

      Delightfully put Ms Delon x
    • February 27, 2011 8:38 PM GMT
      • Post(s)
        15
      • Thank(s)
        0
      • Thanked
        0
      • cR(s)
        0 0

      Untitled

      Erm dont quite understand have my photos been moderated didnt think they were that bad they have gone off main page yet others have similar on ???

    • February 27, 2011 10:32 PM GMT
      • Post(s)
        139
      • Thank(s)
        0
      • Thanked
        0
      • cR(s)
        0 0

      Untitled

      It might be that some of the main feeds have some sensorship but images will still be on profiles.

      Anyway - headless profile pic are fine of course some people are further on this journey and feel able to show themselves more - we are all different.

      Interestingly Barbie Video has been viewed more than any other- what does that say? Maybe some should great a poll to gather some opinion.

      Still working on the moderated feeds.


      X Beckie
    • February 28, 2011 12:25 AM GMT
      • Post(s)
        251
      • Thank(s)
        0
      • Thanked
        0
      • cR(s)
        0 0

      Untitled

      not seen the Barbie avideo yet - perhaps we all want to be girls and the ultimate girl figurewise is Barbie - probably reflects what hetro/lesbian girls are attracted to which is a stereotype of feminine perfection, like it or not of course.....
    • February 28, 2011 3:37 AM GMT
      • Post(s)
        15
      • Thank(s)
        0
      • Thanked
        0
      • cR(s)
        0 0

      Untitled

      The things you do when you cant sleep anyway to let you know the non-adult album still not showing but adult one is.
    • February 28, 2011 4:53 PM GMT
      • Post(s)
        41
      • Thank(s)
        0
      • Thanked
        0
      • cR(s)
        0 0

      Untitled

      Michelle Delon said:i was invited to this discussion therefore i shall add my opinion!

      Im no expert with regards what can or cant be done in terms of moderation although seeing explicit photos should be basically an opt-in choice. How this is done i dont know as moderation by a small group of people over thousands of photos is nigh on impossible. I suppose relying on users to declare x rated photos is a start and then perhaps the flagging facility will 'clean up' the naughty people haha.

      Each to their own BUT personally id rather choose whether or not i want to see some flaccid c0ck surrounded by stockings and suspenders belt struggling to contain hairy legs and belly haha.

      Decorum please, whatever part of the huge gender/sexual rainbow you identify with!

      Michelle x

      Well stated. I thinks that's what I wanted to say, teehee.

      I am sure that our mistress of IT, Becca will eventually find a solution, but I will try my best to ask everyone to post and title albums appropriately.

      Kisses all
      Jasmine
    • March 1, 2011 2:08 AM GMT
      • Post(s)
        201
      • Thank(s)
        0
      • Thanked
        1
      • cR(s)
        1 0

      Untitled

      I have not bought into this discussion yet as I agree with the general gist and direction of opinion expressed by all the girls here.
      The fence I'm sitting on is very comfy thank you !

      I believe that images and comments of an explicitly sexual nature should be confined to the realms of privacy. Self regulation will always result in some people stepping over the line, so we do need some "Knob Police" to slap some botty's ! Discussions like this are so necessary to define the parameters of acceptance and, indeed, to define the spirit and 'personality' of Transtastic. I am sure Becca would agree that this is a work-in-progress.

      Thanks to Robbie for your reference. I know little about Henry the Eighth other than memories of a silly song way back in the distant past.
      "I'm 'enery the aif I am, enery the aif I am I am, I got married to the woman next door, she's been married seven times or more, and every one was an 'enery, never a Willy or a Sam, I'm her aif old man named 'enery, 'enry the aif I am!"

      Could someone please tell me who sang that awful ditty so I can go around and turn off their life support system ???????

      Laughs ? I got 'em coming out of every orifice !!!
    • March 1, 2011 5:50 PM GMT
      • Post(s)
        13
      • Thank(s)
        0
      • Thanked
        0
      • cR(s)
        0 0

      Untitled

      ...it was herman's hermits by all accounts Nicki. Thanks to google once more!

      Oh and i prefer Cindy, much more of a real girl :)
    • March 5, 2011 8:16 PM GMT
      • Post(s)
        251
      • Thank(s)
        0
      • Thanked
        0
      • cR(s)
        0 0

      Untitled

      Oh dear bits are being highly lighted again - it would be so nice if people would self moderate to a decent level - yes have it in your albums if thats what you like but not on the home page it really should not be up here!!!! Idiots!!!
    • March 12, 2011 8:37 PM GMT
      • Post(s)
        24
      • Thank(s)
        0
      • Thanked
        0
      • cR(s)
        0 0

      Untitled

      been quiet for a while-no nudes is good nudes
    • March 13, 2011 4:14 AM GMT
      • Post(s)
        201
      • Thank(s)
        0
      • Thanked
        1
      • cR(s)
        1 0

      Untitled

      Yeah, Terri, no news is good news. Ha ha !
      It is interesting how our morality and acceptance of things said and unsaid change over time.
      I can never really understand why sexuality and nudity and any sort of honesty about what is under our clothes or what happens in pleasurable and natural acts of human beings loving each other and their physicality, should be deemed "dirty" or "obscene" or "evil" ? ... As far as I can think, it is a part of our "civilization", ... to have large numbers of humans living together in communes and then villages and so on ... and to ensure that you have fighters to defend your community, you need rules of procreation ?
      Religion stepped in and helped the rulers to achieve their armies, .. to fight wars against other megalomaniacs, with their own rules and laws about who can make a new soldier !
      All pretty simple if you take a clear eyed look at it.
      Your so-called Royal family is one case in point ?

    Icon Legend and Forum Rights

  • Topic has replies
    Hot topic
    Topic unread
    Topic doesn't have any replies
    Closed topic
    BBCode  is closed
    HTML  is closed
    You don't have permission to post or reply a topic
    You don't have permission to edit a topic
    You don't have the permission to delete a topic
    You don't have the permission to approve a post
    You don't have the permission to make a sticky on a topic
    You don't have the permission to close a topic
    You don't have the permission to move a topic

Add Reputation

Do you want to add reputation for this user by this post?

or cancel